主要论文
[1] The Impacts of Government Ideology on Innovation: What Are the Main Implications?[J].Research Policy, 2019(48)5:1232-1247.(SSCI,ABS4星+)
[2] Impacts of epidemics on innovation: An empirical analysis[J]. Technovation,2022: 102634.. (SSCI,ABS3星)
[3] CBIand Green Innovation[J].Technovation,2022, (Accepted). (SSCI,ABS3星)
[4] The impact of extreme weathereventson green innovation: which ones bring tothe most harm[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2023,188: 122322. (SSCI,ABS3星)
[5] Does Corruption Hurt Green Innovation? Yes-Global Evidence from Cross-validation. [J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2023, 188:122313. (SSCI,ABS3星)
[6] Legal Origins and Innovation: Global Evidence [J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2 022, 174: 121216. (SSCI,ABS3星)
[7] Does Health InnovationRelieve Disease Burden? The Comprehensive Evidence [J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2022, 174: 121216. (SSCI,ABS3星)
[8] Venture Capital and Innovation in China: The Non-Linear Evidence[J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2018(46).148-162 (SSCI)
[9] The assessment of globalization on innovation in Chinese manufacturing firms [J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2019(50), 190-202.(SSCI).
[10] Innovation performance in digital economy: does digital platform capability, improvisation capability and organizational readiness really matter? [J].European Journal of Innovation Management, 2021, (Forthcoming). (SSCI)
[11] Shedding light on determinants of green innovation adoption in SMEs: A PLS-SEM Approach[J].European Journal of Innovation Management,2019, (Forthcoming). (SSCI)
[12] Is higher government efficiency bringing about higher innovation? [J].Technological and Economic Development of Economy 2021,27 (3), 626-655.(SSCI)
[13] The impact of epidemics on green innovation: Global analysis[J].Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2023: 1-24.
[14] An empirical investigation of the relationship between real exchange rate and innovation: Evidence from China[J].International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2023,1-16。(SSCI,ABS3星)
[15] Geographical technology diversification and firms’ innovativeness [J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2020, 48, 100740 (SSCI,ABS3星).
[16] Stock Liquidity and Enterprise Innovation: New Evidence [J].European Journal of Finance, 2018(24),9:683-713. (SSCI,ABS3星)
[17] Theimpact of Financial Risk on Green Innovation[J].Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2023, 101896 (SSCI)
[18] Does inflation targeting cause financial instability? An empirical test of paradox of credibility hypothesis[J].North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2020, 52:101164. (SSCI)
[19] Impacts of Digital Trade Restrictiveness on Green Technology Innovation: An Empirical Analysis[J].Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2023: 1-23.
[20] Capital Market Opening and ESG Performance[J].Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,2022, 1-11. (SSCI)
[21] Earnings management, Ownership concentration and Capitalization of Research & Development expenditure[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2021, 58(4), 1191-1205. (SSCI)
[22] Does Climate Vulnerability Promote More Green Investment.[J].Energy Economics,2023 (SSCI,ABS3星)
[23] Green innovation, natural extreme events, and energy transition: Evidence from Asia-Pacific economies[J].Energy Economics,2023, 121: 106638. (SSCI,ABS3星)
[24] The impact of extreme events on energy price risk[J].Energy Economics, 2021, 99: 105308. (SSCI,ABS3星)
[25] Does the shale gas boom change the natural gas price-production relationship? Evidence from the U.S. market[J].Energy Economics, 2021,93:104327. (SSCI,ABS3星)
[26] Governance and tax revenue: does foreign aid matter? [J].International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2022(Accepted). (SSCI,ABS3星)
[27] Separation of ownership and control for Chinese listed firms: Effect on the cost of debt and the moderating role of bank competition[J].Journal of Asian Economics , 2020, 67, 101179.(SSCI)
[28] Quality of Governance and Corporate Real Investment: Assessing the Impact of Foreign Aid [J].Bulletin of Economic Research, 2022, 74(4): 1115-1134.
[29] Do Working Women Contribute to Higher Consumption Expenditures? [J].Journal of Economics, 2021(Accepted). (SSCI)
[30] Does Government Ideology Influence Environmental Performance? Evidence Based on A New Dataset [J]. Economics Systems.2016,40(2):232–246.(SSCI)
[31] The impact of international sanctions on innovation of target countries [J].Economics Politics,2022, 1–41. (SSCI)
[32] Achieving green environment targets in the world’s top 10 emitter countries: the role of green innovations and renewable electricity production [J].Economic Research, 2022(Accepted).. (SSCI)
[33] The impact of financial development on economic indicators: A dynamic panel data analysis [J].Economic Research,2022, 35 (1), 2930-2942. (SSCI)
[34] Effect of terrorism on economic growth in Pakistan: an empirical analysis[J].Economic Research,2019,(32)1:1794–1812. (SSCI)
[35] Impact of Financial Development on Agricultural Productivity in South Asia[J].Agricultural Economics, 2019, (Forthcoming) (SSCI).
[36] Corporate governance, litigation risk and firm performance: a mediation model [J].International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2022. (SSCI)
[37] TFP growth in Chinese cities: The role of factor-intensity and industrial agglomeration[J]. Economic Modelling,2020, 91, pp. 534–549. (SSCI)
[38] Is Higher Government Efficiency Conducive to Improving Energy Use Efficiency? Evidence from OECD Countries[J].Economic Modelling, 2018, 72, pp. 65–77. (SSCI)
[39] Globalization and Real GDP: New Evidence Using Panel Vector Autoregression[J].TheSingapore Economic Review, 2015,60(3): 121-155. (SSCI)
[40] Corruption and Innovation: Linear and Non-linear Investigations of OECD Countries[J].The Singapore Economic Review, 2018, 65(01).
[41] Do Working Women Cause Innovation? An Untouched Reality[J].E&M Economics a Management, 2020(Accepted). (SSCI)
[42] The influence of FDI on domestic innovation: An investigation using structural breaks[J]. Prague Economic Papers, 2020, 29(4):403-423 (SSCI).
[43] Symmetric and Asymmetric Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Food Prices in China: A New Evidence [J].Resources Policy, 2021(Accepted). (SSCI)
[44] Volatility in natural resources prices and economic performance: Evidence from BRICS economies [J]. Resources Policy, Volume 75, March 2022, 102472.. (SSCI)
[45] Economic performance and natural resources commodity prices volatility: Evidence from global data[J].Resources Policy, 2022, 78, 102879. (SSCI)
[46] Government green environmental concerns and corporate real investment decisions: Does financial sector development matter? [J].Energy Policy, 2021(Accepted). (SSCI)
[47] Does globalization matter for environmental degradation? Nexus among energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon dioxide emission [J].Energy Policy, 2021,153, 112230(SSCI).
[48] Research on influencing factors of renewable energy, energy efficiency, on technological innovation. Does trade, investment and human capital development matter? [J].Energy Policy,2022, 160, 112718. (SSCI)
[49] Pathway toward environmental sustainability: Mediating role of corporate social responsibility in green human resource management practices in SMEs[J].International Journal of Manpower, 2021(Accepted). (SSCI)
[50] Effect of Trade Openness on Pollution in China--New Findings Using wavelet and Frequency domain causality test [J].Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2019 (Forthcoming) (SSCI).
[51] Science-technology intermediary and innovation in China: Evidence from State Administration for Market Regulation, 2000–2019 [J]. Technology in Society, 2022, 68, 101864. (SSCI)
[52] Does green intellectual capital matter for green innovation adoption? Evidence from the manufacturing SMEs of Pakistan[J].Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2021, 22(5), 868-888.. (SSCI)
[53] Agricultural Innovation: A comparative analysis of economic benefits gained by farmers under climate resilient and conventional agricultural practices[J].Land Use Policy, 2021, 108, 105581.. (SSCI)
[54] The pioneer evidence of contagious corruption[J].Quality & Quantity, 2018, 52(2), 945-968.. (SSCI)
[55] The comovement between venture capital and innovation in China: What are the implications?[J]. Quality & Quantity, 2016, 51(6):2489–2506.. (SSCI)
[56] 风险投资与企业创新:“增值”与“攫取”的权衡视角[J].经济研究, 2018,(02):185-199.(当期封面文章)
[57] 异质机构、企业性质与自主创新[J].经济研究, 2012, (03):53-64.(权威期刊)
[58] 股票流动性、股权治理与国企绩效[J].经济学季刊, 2021, (04):1301-132.(权威期刊)
[59] 究竟哪些因素决定了中国企业的技术创新?——基于九大中文经济学权威期刊和A股上市公司数据的再实证[J].中国工业经济, 2021(01):17-35.(权威期刊)
[60] 中国上市公司治理与企业技术创新关系的实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2008,(07):91-101.(权威期刊)
[61] 分层制度提升新三板流动性了吗?——来自多维断点回归的经验证据[J].金融研究,2019 (05):170-189. (权威期刊)
[62] 股票流动性会促进企业创新吗?[J].金融研究, 2017,(03):25-35.(权威期刊)
[63] 异质债务、企业规模与R&D投入[J].金融研究,2011,(01):167-181.(权威期刊)
[64] 数字经济创新发展中的技术道德问题——基于经济学视角的分析[J].经济学家, 2021,(03):35-43.(权威期刊)
[65] 数字经济创新探究:一个综合视角[J].经济学家,2020,(02):82-87.(权威期刊)
[66] 高铁开通与绿色全要素生产率——时空压缩下的城市经济高质量发展[J],南开经济研究,2023(07)(权威期刊)
[67] 上游垄断与下游创新——来自中国制造业企业的经验证据[J],南开经济研究,2022(09):132-150.(权威期刊)
[68] 地方官员变更与企业创新——基于融资约束和创新贡献度的路径探寻[J].南开经济研究, 2019(03):198-225. (权威期刊)
[69] 国际制裁与目标国技术创新[J].经济科学,2023.(权威期刊)
[70] 论市场结构与信息结构对经济效率的影响——以家政市场为例[J].经济科学,2019, (05):69-79.(权威期刊)
[71] 政策不确定性如何影响企业创新[J].经济管理,2016, (10): 41-53.(权威期刊)
[72] 异质并购、债务治理与股东收益[J].经济管理, 2015, (05):139-152. (权威期刊)
[73] 税收分成与经济发展方式转变:机制分析和经验证据[J].财政研究, 2022, (07):3-15. (权威期刊)
[74] 经济开放度与中国国际技术创新——基于省际PCT国际专利申请数据的经验研究[J].国际贸易问题, 2018(11):120-131.(权威期刊)
[75] 数字贸易对国际贸易壁垒的消解、重构及中国应对[J].国际贸易,2023, (02):64-71.(权威期刊)
[76] “双循环”新发展格局下我国国际科技合作:新形势与提升策略[J].国际贸易, 2021(06):14-21.(国内经济类权威期刊)
[77] “一带一路”倡议下知识产权与标准化国际合作的战略思考[J].国际贸易,2019, (07):88-96.(权威期刊)
[78] 中国人力资本、人力资本结构与产业结构升级[J].中国人口、资源与环境, 2011,(10): 138-146.(CSSCI源期刊)
[79] 风险投资与我国小微企业的技术创新[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2020,(12):126-139.(CSSCI源期刊)
[80] 高管持股促进了企业创新吗?——基于2005-2017年上市公司的经验数据[J].人文杂志,2019(11):74-84.(CSSCI源期刊)
[81] 中国货币政策与宏观审慎政策的协调搭配研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2019,39(05):60-73.(CSSCI源期刊)
[82] 沪港通会促进我国国有企业技术创新吗?[J].产业经济研究,2019(04):88-100.(CSSCI源期刊)
[83] “一带一路”背景下动漫企业创意创新合作机制研究——基于产业价值链动态博弈的视角[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,49(02):155-162.(CSSCI源期刊)
[84] 专利、技术创新与经济增长——一个综述[J].华东经济管理,2019,33(08):152-160.
[85] 民族地区中小企业技术创新金融支持的路径与策略[J].贵州民族研究,2019,40(01): 139-143.
[86] 海外并购、文化距离与技术创新[J].当代经济科学, 2016,(03):25-35.(CSSCI源期刊)
[87] 风险投资与技术创新的非线性关系研究—基于PSTR的实证分析[J].产业经济研究, 2016,(02):32-42. (CSSCI源期刊)
[88] 风险投资对上市公司业绩影响的实证研究[J].软科学, 2016, (2):12-21. (CSSCI源期刊)
[89] 政府研发补贴、社会投资跟进与企业创新融资[J].经济经纬, 2016, (01):114-119. (CSSCI源期刊)
[90] 制度环境、金融发展与地区技术创新[J].山西财经大学学报,2016, (06):41-52. (CSSCI源期刊)
[91] 异质性风险投资、联合持股与IPO抑价[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2016,(02):57 -67.(CSSCI源期刊)
[92] 科技自立自强:逻辑缘起、内涵解构与实现进路[J].上海经济研究, 2022,(08):5-14. (CSSCI源期刊)
[93] 我国创业板异质性风险投资及其联合持股与IPO抑价关系研究[J].上海经济研究, 2015,(12):23-33. (CSSCI源期刊)
[94] 风险投资介入是否可以提高战略性新兴产业的绩效[J].产业经济研究, 2015, (02) :79-89. (CSSCI源期刊)
[95] 中国战略性新兴产业风投控股的绩效研究[J].山西财经大学学报, 2015, (01):48-57. (CSSCI源期刊)
[96] 股东权力关联、薪酬激励与企业绩效——以政府控股公司为例[J].山西财经大学学报,2014,(12):70-82.(CSSCI源期刊)
[97] 收购兼并、异质股东与企业绩效[J].当代经济科学,2014,(03):104-111+127-128. (CSSCI源期刊)
[98] 进入壁垒与市场绩效关系的实证研究[J].产业经济评论,2014,(01) :10-38. (CSSCI源期刊)
[99] 我国主板、中小板、创业板上市公司的技术创新能力比较分析[J].当代经济科学,2013, (6):50-57 .(CSSCI源期刊)
[100] 异质性机构对企业集团关联交易影响的实证研究[J].财贸研究,2013,(02):129-137. (CSSCI源期刊)
[101] 股权治理、研发投入与公司绩效[J].财贸研究, 2012, (10) :139-146.(CSSCI源期刊)
[102] 金融中介发展、企业异质性与技术创新[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2012, (01):23-28 (CSSCI源期刊)
[103] 异质股东、研发投资与企业绩效[J].财贸研究,2012,(05):139-147. (CSSCI源期刊)
[104] 金融中介发展、政府干预与企业技术创新——来自我国转轨经济的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策,2011,(20):75-79. (CSSCI源期刊)
[105] 法律、投资者保护与企业自主创新[J].当代经济科学,2011,(05):50-58+126. (CSSCI源期刊)
[106] 董事会治理与企业技术创新:理论与实证[J].当代经济科学, 2011,(03):110-116.(CSSCI源期刊)
[107] X效率与股东回报:基于上市商业银行的实证分析[J].经济问题,2011,(09):100-104. (CSSCI源期刊)
[108] 构建完善的环境产权交易市场研究——以西部地区为例[J].学术界,2011,(08),201-208. (CSSCI源期刊)
[109] 论经营者激励机制与企业技术创新[J].统计与信息论坛,2010,(04):69-75.(CSSCI源期刊)
[110] 农村公共物品对农户福利影响理论研究综述[J].经济纵横,2009,(06):122-124. (CSSCI源期刊)
[111] 我国股票市场、房地产市场与经济增长的关系[J].统计与决策,2007,(20):90-92. (CSSCI源期刊)
[112] 我国上市公司的融资结构及其变动趋势[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2007,(04): 28-34 (CSSCI源期刊)